Archive for March 21, 2011

March 30, 2011

Posted by Ian McKee in Advocacy, Blog, Marketing | Comment Here | Via Inc.

You can’t run your company the same way forever. Here are 10 ideas to bring about change and breathe new life into your business.

Click here to find out more!

Change is very important. Whether it is a complete overhaul or a few adjustments, every company can stand a bit of improvement.

Evolution is inevitable. If your company is operating the same way today as it did when it was first launched, then you are stagnant, which means you are losing business. Change is very important. Whether it is a complete overhaul or a few adjustments, every company can stand a bit of improvement, says Michael Silverstein, a consumer and retail expert with The Boston Consulting Group (BCG), a global management consulting firm. “Even awkward first steps toward improvement are highly regarded by consumers.”

Seattle‘s Best Coffee, part of the Starbucks family, revitalized its business and its 40-year-old brand earlier this year as part of its new strategic direction. The company is rapidly expanding its diverse distribution with a goal of establishing 100,000 places—from Burger King to Alaska Airlines—where people can enjoy a freshly-brewed cup of its premium coffee. Within six months, the company increased ten-fold from 3,000 to 30,000 distribution points that include company operated stores, franchised businesses, retailers, grocers, restaurant chains, and food service locations, such as college campuses.

What lessons can entrepreneurs gain from Seattle’s Best Coffee when it comes to revamping their brand or business model? Here are a few suggestions to consider before diving in.

1. Be Ready for Change

Revamping your business requires shifting your thinking and being ready, willing and able to let go of things you felt were perfect, which may no longer be the case. A first step is to be open to changing or adjusting the way you do business and you have to be prepared to act immediately. For Seattle’s Best Coffee, it all began one afternoon last summer with a conversation between Michelle Gass, president of Seattle’s Best Coffee, and Howard Schultz, CEO, president, and founder of Starbucks Corporation. Starbucks and all its brands of coffee in total have less than a 10 percent share of the brewed coffee market in the United States. “We saw an opportunity to grow the Seattle’s Best Coffee brand and to approach the coffee category very differently…in every phase of our business—partnerships, retail, and packaged goods,” says Gass.

2. Determine Your Mission

Revamping your business involves taking stock of your company’s strengths and weaknesses—what’s the total picture not just a snapshot view. Before you embark on any type of product, brand or company change, Gass says to bear in mind two things: 1) be clear about what problem are you trying to solve, and 2) make it a mission project.

3. Talk to People

Ask your customers, employees, business partners and industry experts their opinion about your company—it’s products, services, and brand. Find out what they like and don’t like. How hard is it to do business with your company? What would they suggest; do you need a little revamping or a major overhaul? Have you clearly communicated your positioning? Do you have good price value? Where do you rate in terms of customer satisfaction and brand differentiation? Your market research, both qualitative and quantitative will be able to help you answer some of these questions, says Silverstein, who also is the author of Women Want More: How to Capture Your Share of the World’s Largest, Fastest-Growing Market.

4. Measure Your Total Market

That is the most important thing you can do as a business owner, Silverstein says. “Many companies measure a narrow representation of what their market is.” He cites for example, in targeting its soft drink, Coca-Cola measured its share of colas; meanwhile, Pepsi was watching Aquafina and buying SoBe, Gatorade and Tropicana. The real measurement for both companies is their market share of beverages, Silverstein adds. A good approach is to devote ongoing study in two arenas, within your industry and outside it. How has the market changed in your industry? Is your product or service still relevant? That’s the moneymaking question.

5. Research the Competition and Seek Allies

In the case of Seattle’s Best Coffee, market research unearthed a very important discovery. “The coffee category had gotten very complex and cluttered—lots of names and lots of geographies consumers can’t even pronounce,” says Gass. How could Seattle’s Best Coffee evolve to be more relevant? The company’s new purpose or mission became to make its premium coffee simple and easily accessible.

The company expanded its distribution points by fostering new relationships with retailers and solidifying exciting agreements with companies, including Subway Restaurants, AMC Theaters, Border’s Bookstores, and Royal Caribbean Cruise Lines.

The company created a new brand identity that evokes optimism and fun. A new logo maintains the name and the color red while adding such symbols as a drop of coffee, a cup, and a red semi-circle representing a smile enclosed by a silver circle conveying a silver lining.

6. Rethink Your Customer Base

Part of revamping your business may involve targeting your product or brand to appeal to customers outside your niche demographic, versus introducing new products or lines to boost business. Appealing to a wider customer base can make up for less business by existing customers. Readily available for decades at specialty coffee cafes, kiosks, and food service locations, Seattle’s Best Coffee added to its roster fast-food restaurants and movie theaters.

7. Improve Your Product Availability

There are rapid shifts in channels, Silverstein says. A mono channel player may not see in their data that they are losing share to a changing market. Don’t limit your business to just one distribution channel. This also means making your service or product more compatible to online availability. Gass says exploring new channels for doing business is just as effective as coming up with an entirely new business idea. If your product or service can be utilized in a novel manner, this could lead to increased revenue as well as added value for your customers.

8. Determine Suitable Solutions

Here is where many people get stuck. Do not hesitate. Move forward. Once you have received a set of suggestions and you have figured out where the key issues are in your business, realistically study them to determine what adjustments will best suit your business. Do you need to repackage and reposition your brand? Do you need to identify new distribution channels? Or do you need to streamline processes? The overall goal is to respond with change, advises Silverstein. Analyze what expenses are to be incurred in implementing such change. Zero in on what will save customers money and/or offer the best product value. Identify what improvements are more likely to bring in new customers.

9. Create an Action Plan

Put down on paper what’s wrong, how do you want to fix it, and what is your timeline for implementing that change? Specify the role of every individual team member in accomplishing that change. Engage in dialog back and forth. Do you have the diagnostic right?  Do you have all of the facts on the table that you need to make informed decisions? Are management and workers on board with the changes? Once you have created an action plan, periodically discuss where you are, what did you get right, and where do you need to make adjustments, says Silverstein. Track what works and what doesn’t work.

10. Communicate Clearly and Effectively

Whether its evolution or revolution, if you are going to change, you have to tell the story why, says Gass. Communicate in a way that reflects your brand. “Rather than send out a press release saying that we have a new business strategy, we did a fun video (that can found on Youtube) for internal employees and external stakeholders, where we took over Starbucks headquarters and turned it into Seattle’s Best Coffee building for a day,” Gass explains.

“Change can be hard but you have to be willing to be bold and to be different,” says Gass. “You have to have the conviction that you are in it for the long haul.”

Along the way to revamping your business, you may make some mistakes. That is part of the process. Silverstein says the key is to accelerate through the mistakes, realize them and adjust them until you get it right.

By Carolyn M. Brown

March 25, 2011

Posted by Ian McKee in Blog, Google, Social Media | Comment Here | Via ReadWriteWeb

We believe that Google will preview a major new social service called Google Circles at South by Southwest Interactive today. Update: Google has now officially denied that Circles will launch here, but not that it exists. See final update below, as of afternoon Texas time Google does now deny that Circles exists. If what we’ve heard is correct, the service will offer photo, video and status message sharing. Everything users share on Circles will be shared only with the most appropriate circle of social contacts in their lives, not with all your contacts in bulk. Circles may be shown off at an event co-hosted tonight by the ACLU, an organization focused on privacy and the liberties it affords. It may not be a big public launch yet, but it’s clear that this is a major product in the works at the very least. Please see below the fold for what I hope will be the final update on this for now.

The service has been developed with extensive participation by Chris Messina, the co-creator of numerous successful social and software phenomena online, from BarCamp to Hashtags and much more. Messina declined to comment for this story. Jonathan Sposato, CEO of the photo editing service Piknik that Google acquired last year, is working on Circles as well. Sposato may be the only entrepreneur to have sold not one but two startups to Google – having founded Phatbits, a service that was acquired by Google in 2005 and became Google Gadgets. These are heavy hitting tech leaders and the service should be very interesting.

Google’s response. Google is now telling Liz Gannes at the technology blog All Things D that there is no product being developed. That’s a real shame, if that’s the truth of the matter.

Gannes writes:

When a report emerged this morning of a new social network focused on nuanced sharing called Google Circles, the company said it was not launching anything this week at SXSW. But such a product is not even under development, according to the people supposedly developing it.Google’s Chris Messina, who had been pegged as one of the leaders of Circles, told me directly today that he “didn’t know what [the story] was talking about.”

A trusted source with credible information, among several conversations I’ve had, lead me to draw the conclusions I did. I tried to frame them with some cautious caveats, but now Gannes is being told something different. To be honest, this wouldn’t be the first time I’ve been told that a story I broke “was not based in fact” only to see something pretty darned close get confirmed later. I guess we’ll see about this one.

And now to return to our previously posted report. These details may in fact be a picture of what Google is going to do. They may instead be simply what Google ought to do. Take your pick, we’ll know in time, I suppose.

A Matter of Personas

With Circles, I believe that Google will attempt to accomplish something critics from the blogosphere, academia, SXSW 2010 keynoter danah boyd, privacy watchdogs and others have all called on the social networking world to do: to allow our online communication to respect the same boundaries that our offline social lives do.

School and work, friends and family, the sacred and the profane; we’ve always been able to communicate different things to different people in different circumstances. Facebook, Twitter and other online social networks have collapsed all those contexts into one big bucket. We speak to our “friends” all at once, no matter what we might want to say to one group of people or another. And thus we often feel less comfortable than we might saying anything at all.

This fundamental discomfort has been, many people argue, a limiting factor in the growth, reach and depth of online social interactions. If that problem could be solved, there are big new ways that the online world could grow and evolve. This has been a more sophisticated understanding of privacy, not just as a public/private dichotomy but as a matter of contextual integrity of communication, that we and others have been calling on Facebook to adopt for almost two years.

The development of Circles is likely heavily influenced by the work of ex-Google social technology researcher Paul Adams. Adams has written a book called Social Circles, which will be released this Summer and he published a widely read slide deck about what is wrong with social networking: specifically the lack of respect for context and personas. (The Real Life Social Network) Adams worked on User Experience at Google for four years, but just months after publishing his influencial presentation he left Google for Facebook.

Courting Developers

Given who is working on it, I expect that Google Circles will be as developer friendly as other Google social products, but with a much greater emphasis on design and usability.

googlehackers.jpgMessina and Sposato both have strong backgrounds in working with developers and APIs. Messina was trained as a visual designer and created the full page ad in the New York Times announcing the launch of Firefox, then went on to become a leader in the open web community. His work has included co-creating the international unconference phenomenon called Barcamp, helping build OpenID federated identity system, leading the Activity Streams movement for an interoperable social network user activity data system and initiating the use of #hashtags on Twitter. When he joined Google in January 2010, we wrote extensively about his life and career.

Right: Messina posted this photo on Foursquare today of posters promoting Google’s hacker event at SXSW.

It is nearly inconceivable that Messina would be involved and the effort wouldn’t be a standards-based platform play. If Circles is unveiled at SXSW, the timing couldn’t be better from a developer relations perspective. Google can position itself as going exactly the opposite direction Twitter is. Twitter saw its biggest outpouring of criticism yet when it told developers on Friday that they should not build any more basic interfaces, clients, for using Twitter. It remains to be seen how that will play out, but if a major social network wanted to try to lure developers to build on their platform, this could be a good time to start talking about it.

Google Tries Again

Google has launched many different social efforts over the years but has remained far behind Facebook and Twitter in its efforts. Social networking is an important technology for Google to find success with as it’s a key way that people spend time online and that targeted advertisements are delivered to those people.

Google Buzz felt overbearing and bolted on. It also got privacy terribly, terribly wrong. Google Wave was more confusing than collaborative. Google’s Open Social interoperable widget platform was hugely hyped as a distributed Facebook killer, but it now primarily focused on enterprise social networks.

Reports emerged last June that Google has been working on a secret social project called Google Me.

In December a screenshot was leaked to TechCrunch showing a new toolbar item on Google.com called “Loop.” (Loop seems similar to Circles – I think Circles is better.) I believe that Circles will be a toolbar level service as well.

It’s hard to think of a stronger angle to take than support for contextual integrity of communication and conversation, of personas in social networking.

Google has tried and failed in many other (though not all) social efforts. Bringing some of the best thinking and the best innovators in the world to a new effort to tackle one of the world’s biggest problems is very ambitious.

Presuming that the things we’re hearing are true (I believe they are), then we’ll follow up with in-depth coverage of Google Circles once it’s launched. That may be tonight, it may be as far in the future as the Google IO developer conference in two months – but I believe we are going to see at least some parts of it today. More clear than the timing is that this is definitely happening: Google is putting some of its most innovative social thinkers behind a major product called Circles and focused on personas.

March 24, 2011

Posted by Ian McKee in Blog, Marketing Trends | Comment Here | Via Business Insider

chart-of-the-day-newspapers-classified-ads-revenue-2000-2010-march-2011.jpg

The newspaper industry was the home of classified advertising, and it represented easy money for them. However, since they were unwilling to lead the way to putting that online, believing that this would cannibalise their business, they lost that revenue stream to new start-ups. Business cannibalism is a necessary business strategy in times of change – but one that is fought hard by the “old guard” in an organisation.

March 22, 2011

adamlevinevid.jpg Well we are just one day away from Coca-Cola’s crowdsourcing campaign featuring Maroon 5. The idea is that Maroon 5 will open up their studio for a 24h live stream event on Facebook with Coca-Cola, working together to with their social communities to concept, write, record and produce a new song in just 24 hours, made completely from the communities input.

The event is by Facebook invite only and at the moment, has about 6,000 RSVP’s while the campaign video is a little static at just 15,000 views on YouTube… So, the question begs to be asked, is branded crowdsourcing getting old? Perhaps just so common that people just don’t want to engage with it any more? Coca Cola has over 23 million Facebook fans, so you’d be expecting at least 100,000 people to accept the invite right? That’s not even half a percent!

Weirdly, the last 7x posts to those 23 million plus fans were specifically promos for the Maroon 5 crowdsourcing campaign, it seems that the entire community has just ignored it, with only a few hundred comments per post. So what’s your opinion on campaigns like this? And are sponsored crowdsourcing campaigns dead? Click here to check out the campaign site…

March 21, 2011

Posted by Ian McKee in Advertising, Blog, Mobile, Web/Tech | Comment Here | Via iTWire

Paul Fisher, CEO of IAB Australia, told the Future of Digital Advertising Summit conference in Sydney this week: “Online will very quickly become the number one advertising channel by volume and by share, overtaking television and newspapers. There are only two other countries where that has happened: the UK and Denmark.

“Australia is a very fast growing economy for digital advertising: it is growing faster than the global market and faster than Asia Pacific.”

He told the audience: “We are going to move very heavily into a world where media planning and buying for advertising and for measurement is not about digital as a silo as it has been for the last 10 or 15 years. It is now going to be now very much in comparison with TV and newspapers.”

He added: “Global marketers with multibillion dollar budgets are not moving into digital because they think it is sexy…The single reason driving online advertising growth is consumer behaviour: people are spending huge amounts of time online.”

Fisher cited forecasts from PricewaterhouseCoopers that put the CAGR for the digital advertising marketing in Australia growing at an average of 14.2 percent between now and 2014, compared to 13.7 percent for Asia Pacific and 10.6 percent globally.

For Australia, PWC is forecasting TV advertising to grow at an average of 1.9 percent to 2014 to reach $3.808b, newspaper advertising to grow at 3.9 percent to reach $3.811b and Internet advertising to grow at 15.4 percent to reach $3.854b.

“When people say to you ‘Is the money moving out of TV and newspaper to digital?’ of course it is…There is a strategic shift of billions of dollar of money moving out of TV and newspapers and into digital every year over the next three or four years,” Fisher said. “But TV and newspaper advertising are not going to die. They will still be multibillion dollar industries.”

The big winner, according to Fisher, will be search advertising. “We think search will be the dominant player, probably securing a 50 percent share of the market. Display will take around 27-30 percent and classifieds about 23-25 percent. We don’t think those shares wil change much.”

Fisher said strong growth was expected in video advertising: its share of the online marketing spend in Australia is presently significantly smaller than in the US and UK.

“In the US five percent of total online ad spend and 14 percent of display ad spend goes on video. In Australia those figures are only 1.4 percent and five percent. It’s likely we will follow the same growth curve as the US over the next three or four years.”

Mobile advertising growth in Australia is tipped to outstrip global growth by even greater margins than the overall digital advertising market. PWC is forecasting 73.0 percent CAGR to take the figure from $26m in 2010 to $219m in 2014, compared to global growth figures of 27.7 percent and 22.5 percent for Asia Pacific. Fisher said these figures were for display ads only.

However he said there was a lack of accurate data on the Australian market compared to Internet advertising. “We don’t have in this country an accurate capture of mobile advertising expenditure, but we intend to change that in the first half of this year. There is an initiative where we are going to try and persuade publishers to offer up their actual mobile advertising revenues to PricewaterhouseCoopers as they do for online expenditure.”

Page 1 of 3
1
2
3